Tag Archives: Exact Globe
New item codes from your supplier?
Posted on 05. Dec, 2011 by Richard Smits.
When you receive a file with the new item codes from your supplier, you can update your items in one go. The batch update functionality is best used for this purpose. In product update 401, the batch update functionality has been enhanced. You can maintain your ‘supplier’s item code’ and update the information automatically using [...]
Continue Reading
Welcome to Exact Globe Next
Posted on 01. Dec, 2011 by Vincent Henricks.
Exact Globe Next offers one menu which functions as a shell to combine and give access to several solutions: Exact Globe, Exact Synergy Enterprise, Exact Event Manager and integration with SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS).
Continue Reading
Exact Integration – Support matrix
Posted on 07. Nov, 2011 by Ruud Aalders.
Hi All, Lately I have been receiving questions about the supported versions in combination with Exact Integration. From that perspective I thought it would be good to address that we have documentation on this available to all customers. The support matrix of Exact Integration is available not only through searching the web, it is also added [...]
Continue Reading
Isabel Go integrated in Exact Globe
Posted on 10. Oct, 2011 by Alexander Kutilov.
I have already mentioned about our awareness of the growing demand of Exact Globe customers to have the ability to start sending payment and collection orders to banks online and receiving bank statements online and thus having banking information real-time available. Like I have announced earlier, as of the Exact Globe product update 402 Belgian [...]
Continue Reading
Exact Integration – What’s going on?
Posted on 03. Oct, 2011 by Ruud Aalders.
Hi all, It has been around 2 months now that Exact Integration has been released. I am sure you are curious to know what we have been doing in the past 2 months and what our plans are for the near future. In the recently released Exact Synergy Enterprise 247 we have focused on our customer feedback, but [...]
