Growing number of standard HRM reports in Exact Synergy Enterprise

Growing number of standard HRM reports in Exact Synergy Enterprise

Posted on 10. Mar, 2010 by in Exact Synergy

Last week at the Partner Conference of Exact Netherlands in Bussum, Exact announced Exact Reporting Services Integration in Exact Synergy Enterprise which enables creating flexible and graphical web reports. Exact Reporting Services Integration will be available as of product update 243, which is expected to be general available by the end of April.

For HRM a large number of standard HRM reports and KPI’s will be added in the coming period. The first set of reports that you can expect includes a birthday list, absence overview, Inflow/Outflow, FTE per cost center, expiry date contracts, etc.

I am looking for suggestions from your side. If you have ideas about additional HRM reports, please create a comment to this article below or let me know directly via vincent.henricks[at]exact.com.

Photo credit: Jorge Franganillo

Related posts:

Tags: , ,

4 Responses to “Growing number of standard HRM reports in Exact Synergy Enterprise”

  1. Rafael Ruiz

    10. Mar, 2010

    One common request from clients, is the need of a report that shows the difference in hours between the different steps in a workflow. Is this possible?

    Reply to this comment
  2. Barry van der Meij

    11. Mar, 2010

    In Synergy Enterprise this is a standard pivot analysis functionality, if possible this i the most powerfull improvement in Synergy Enterprise compared to claic. You can compare different values from a request type or category by jut choosing for the option “list”. Group by the value you want en display for example quantity 1, quantity 1 realized, hours, hours realized, amount and amount realized next to eachother…..

    Good Luck!

    Reply to this comment
  3. Robert Klein

    13. Mar, 2010

    Need EEO-1 report for US market

    Reply to this comment
  4. Sunil Girdhari

    14. Mar, 2010

    Robert, lets setup a EEO-1 report together

    Reply to this comment

Leave a Reply